A critical review of a published peer-refereed empirical/analytical (i.e. which uses primary or secondary data) paper within their general discipline of study. This review should contain an assessment of: 1. The philosophical underpinnings of the research 2. The theory used to support the research 3. The appropriateness of the methodology used given the philosophical and theoretical approach 4. An alternative theory that could have been used 5. An alternative research methodology that could have been used (and the implications of this alternative method in terms of sampling, data collection and analysis); 6. Any ethical issues that could be associated with the conduct of the research. 7. Some additional future research directions that the author(s) could consider the article related Occupational Health and Safety Management System Word length of Critical Review: 2,500 words. The theory in the early part of the article seems to be implied rather than clearly stated
46 freelanceria on tarjonnut keskimäärin %project_bid_stats_avg_sub_26% %project_currencyDetails_sign_sub_27% tähän työhön
HI there, I have seen the attached article by Yoon et al., and will surely do its review as per the given instructions. Please let me know the deadline. Thanks
I have briefly read the description on critical review development, and I can deliver as per the requirements however I need us to discuss for more clarity on the details, deadline and budget as well.
I can critically review your paper on the provided 7 dimensions. You can message me and I will share my complete portfolio with you. I have been writing research papers and technical papers since the last 5 years.