
Avoin
Julkaistu
•
Päättyy 4 päivän päästä
Maksettu toimituksen yhteydessä
I need a detailed systematic review on "machine-learning early detection warning system for intraoperative hypotension." This review is for academic submission and should be 23-25 pages in length (double spaced) with no intention to publish. I will provide the reference list (see below towards the bottom). Please expect that I will need revisions of the draft as my school will requires changes as they per their suggestions. PLEASE NOTE: my school is VERY strict with using AI to write the actual paper. It's fine to use AI for support, but not in the actual writing out of the paper. This is why I'm outsourcing this. Key Focus Areas: - Clinical outcomes with an emphasis on accuracy of predictions and reduction in adverse events - Comprehensive analysis of clinical trials. - Research question: In patients undergoing surgery, does the utility of a machine-learning early detection warning system for intraoperative hypotension compared to standard care monitoring reduce the likelihood of developing postoperative organ injury? Ideal Skills and Experience: - Experience in putting together systematic review for a topic using existing clinical trials. - The articles referenced must be no more than 5 years old The below are the required subsections of this paper: ABSTRACT: should be structured into four paragraphs not exceeding 250 words total. It must be written in complete sentences. Abbreviations should be avoided. No literature should be cited in this section. The abstract must include your testable hypothesis and how you tested it. Sections: ● Hypothesis: State the hypothesis of the study (see How to Write a Hypothesis in Moodle/LMS) ● Methods: Identify the study design and statistical methods used ● Results: Describe the outcome of the study and the statistical significance, if appropriate ● Conclusions: State the significance of the results ● Word Count: Provide a word count for the abstract ● Keywords: Following the abstract, provide 3 to 10 keywords for indexing purposes INTRODUCTION: The introduction should provide a clear statement of the problem, the relevant literature on the subject, and the proposed approach or solution. The introduction must: ● Be well referenced ● Begin with an impactful statement ● Begin broadly to educate readers about the general topic, then narrow down to the focus of the paper ● Use references that are NOT used in the results section 4. METHODS: The methods should contain enough information to allow the study to be replicated, including: ● Databases used ● Search strategy ● Search terms ● Inclusion / exclusion criteria (state the parameters for including references in your paper and the parameters used to exclude references, i.e. year published or population type) ● Methods of data analysis (how the evidence table was constructed ● Statistical methods used ● Written in past tense RESULTS: The results should be presented with clarity and precision, and should: ● Summarize the data and key findings of the selected primary literature (i.e. populations, outcomes, etc.) ● Synthesize the data contained in multiple studies, providing any relationship between those studies (i.e. similarities in data) ● Include an Evidence Table as an Appendix to the paper ● Reference all citations in the evidence table ● Written in past tense DISCUSSION: Authors should explain what the results mean and how the results relate to the hypothesis presented. The discussion should interpret the findings and should include: ● Explanation of the findings (not a reiteration of the results) ● Interpretation of the results ● Assessment of the primary literature's impact on the hypothesis (answer the question - does the data support the hypothesis?) ● Limitations and future directions ● All citations in the evidence table referenced ● Conclusion: A concluding paragraph should be added at the end of the paper that clearly states how the hypothesis was proven or disproven FIGURES AND TABLES: An Evidence Table: ● Must be included as an Appendix to the paper ● Cited in the results and discussion sections ● Limited use of review articles Other Figures and Tables: ● A maximum of two (2) properly cited figures/tables reproduced directly from the primary literature is permitted. An unlimited number of original figures/tables is permitted. ● All figures should have a title and figure legend that properly describes the dataset (i.e. the lines, boxes, colors, symbols, error bars, abbreviations). ● All figures/tables should be numbered in the order they are cited in the text. References Lai C.J., Cheng Y.J., Han Y.Y., et al. (2024) Hypotension prediction index for prevention of intraoperative hypotension in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Perioper. Med. 13(1), 57. Šribar A., Jurinjak I.S., Almahariq H., et al. (2023) Hypotension prediction index guided versus conventional goal directed therapy to reduce intraoperative hypotension during thoracic surgery: a randomized trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 23(1), 101. Rellum S.R., Schuurmans J., Schenk J., et al. (2023) Effect of the machine learning-derived Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) combined with diagnostic guidance versus standard care on depth and duration of intraoperative and postoperative hypotension in elective cardiac surgery patients: HYPE-2 – study protocol of a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open 13(5), e061832. Ripollés-Melchor J., Espinosa Á.V., Fernández-Valdes-Bango P., et al. (2024) Hypotension Prediction Index-guided intraoperative hemodynamic therapy did not reduce the incidence of postoperative AKI or overall complications compared to standard care. Rev. Esp. Anestesiol. Reanim. 71(10), 719–731. Lorente J.V., Ripollés-Melchor J., Jimenez I.F., et al. (2023) Intraoperative hemodynamic optimization using the hypotension prediction index vs. goal-directed hemodynamic therapy during elective major abdominal surgery: the Predict-H multicenter randomized controlled trial. Front. Anesthesiol. 2, 1193886. Mulder M.P., et al. (2026) Comparison of a mean arterial pressure alarm to the hypotension prediction index in preventing intraoperative hypotension in elective moderate- to high-risk non-cardiac surgical patients: a study protocol for a blinded, parallel, randomized controlled trial with a non-inferiority framework. Trials 27(1), 104. Barker A., et al. (2024) Machine learning predicts unplanned care escalations for post-anesthesia care unit patients during the perioperative period: a single-center retrospective study in surgical patients. J. Med. Syst. 48(1), 91. Wijnberge M., Geerts B.F., Hol L., et al. (2020) Effect of a machine learning-derived early warning system for intraoperative hypotension vs standard care on depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension during elective noncardiac surgery: the HYPE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 323(11), 1052–1060. Murabito P., Astuto M., Sanfilippo F., et al. (2022) Proactive management of intraoperative hypotension reduces biomarkers of organ injury and oxidative stress during elective non-cardiac surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Med. 11(2), 392. Strömblad C.T., Wilson R.S., Kanter G., et al. (2021) Effect of a predictive model on planned surgical duration accuracy, patient wait time, and use of presurgical resources: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 156(4), 322–330. Schneck E., Schulte D., Habig L., et al. (2020) Hypotension Prediction Index based protocolized haemodynamic management reduces the incidence and duration of intraoperative hypotension in primary total hip arthroplasty: a single centre feasibility randomised blinded prospective interventional trial. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 34(6), 1149–1158. Habicher M., Denn S.M., Schneck E., et al. (2025) Perioperative goal-directed therapy with artificial intelligence to reduce the incidence of intraoperative hypotension and renal failure in patients undergoing lung surgery: a pilot study. J. Clin. Anesth. 102, 111777.
Projektin tunnus (ID): 40357512
61 ehdotukset
Avoinna tarjouksille
Etäprojekti
Aktiivinen 23 tuntia sitten
Aseta budjettisi ja aikataulu
Saa maksu työstäsi
Kuvaile ehdotustasi
Rekisteröinti ja töihin tarjoaminen on ilmaista
61 freelancerit tarjoavat keskimäärin $230 USD tätä projektia

Hello, I can help you with this systematic review. Please connect over chat to discuss in details. Looking forward to hearing from you soon.
$350 USD 7 päivässä
9,2
9,2

Hi, I have carefully read your project description and I understand that you need a detailed systematic review on "machine-learning early detection warning system for intraoperative hypotension." This academic submission will focus on clinical outcomes, analysis of clinical trials, and the research question regarding the utility of machine-learning systems in reducing postoperative organ injury. With over 10 years of experience in professional writing, including academic writing and technical content creation, I am well-equipped to handle this project. Before starting the writing process, I always ensure a thorough understanding of the target audience, brand voice, and content objectives to deliver purposeful and results-driven content. For this project, I will structure the content meticulously, maintain the required tone, optimize for SEO (if needed), integrate keywords strategically, conduct in-depth research, and implement a strong call-to-action strategy to engage readers effectively. My goal is to deliver content that enhances credibility, increases engagement, and provides measurable impact. I would be happy to discuss your project further and can start immediately. Best regards, Samina Kiran
$30 USD 1 päivässä
8,4
8,4

With my broad range of skills and experience, I am excellently positioned to write a detailed systematic review on machine-learning early detection warning systems for intraoperative hypotension. I have an extensive background in academic writing, with proficiency in all the areas you have highlighted such as a comprehensive analysis of clinical trials, and structuring abstracts, methods, results and discussion sections. In addition,I am highly skilled at critically appraising primary literature and synthesizing multiple studies—a prerequisite for any rigorous systematic review. As an AI/ML expert with a decade-long research experience, I understand the cautious approach your academic institution demands in this field. Though I respect your school's restrictions on using AI to write the actual paper, let me assure you that I will not only provide human-written content but also adopt an evidence-based approach that avoids any suspicion of plagiarism or violation of your school's policies!
$500 USD 7 päivässä
8,2
8,2

Hello My name is Temi, and I'm a PhD holder with a decade of experience in performing systematic reviews. I've institutional access to peer-reviewed journals, and I've helped many clients here to carry out systematic reviews. Hence, I can meet your needs. Please let me know your deadline. Thank you.
$50 USD 1 päivässä
8,1
8,1

Systematic reviews on machine learning applications in clinical detection require synthesis across heterogeneous trial designs while maintaining strict methodological rigor—this proposal demonstrates the technical competency required. The structure demanded here (hypothesis-driven analysis, evidence tables, statistical integration across RCTs, and clinical outcome mapping) aligns directly with systematic review protocol standards. The work spans comprehensive database searching, extraction of clinical trial data from 2020-2026 publications, construction of evidence tables linking ML accuracy metrics to postoperative organ injury outcomes, and synthesis of findings against the stated research question. Statistical heterogeneity across these trials demands careful interpretation in the discussion section. This project will be executed with attention to the school's AI policy: all narrative content, critical synthesis, and analytical interpretation will be original work. AI tools may support reference organization and preliminary data structuring, but the actual writing, argumentation, and clinical interpretation remain human-authored. Unlimited revisions are included through completion, with Turnitin reports provided for verification. Timeline and deliverables will follow your institution's requirements precisely. Ready to begin immediately.
$30 USD 1 päivässä
7,9
7,9

Machine learning hypotension detection systems require rigorous synthesis of clinical trial data to validate predictive accuracy and postoperative outcomes—this systematic review will consolidate evidence from heterogeneous studies using standardized methodology. The review will establish a structured evidence table synthesizing population characteristics, study designs, ML algorithms, sensitivity/specificity metrics, and postoperative organ injury incidence across the provided references. A PRISMA-aligned methodology section will document database searches, inclusion criteria (2020-2024 publications, RCTs/prospective studies, intraoperative hypotension outcomes), and data extraction protocols. Results will isolate clinical effectiveness: comparing HPI-guided interventions against standard care on AKI incidence, hypotension duration, and adverse events. The discussion will assess whether current evidence supports the hypothesis that ML early warning systems reduce postoperative organ injury versus conventional monitoring. Limitations regarding study heterogeneity and follow-up periods will be addressed. The 23-25 page structure meets academic requirements with full compliance to institutional guidelines on human-written analysis supported by systematic data synthesis rather than AI-generated content. Unlimited revisions and plagiarism/AI detection reports included.
$30 USD 1 päivässä
8,0
8,0

With over a decade of experience in academic research and data analysis, I have honed the skills necessary to execute your systematic review with precision. On top of mastering the quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods that will be crucial in analyzing clinical trials, I am adept in using SPSS, R, Python, SAS, Excel, and Power BI for data analysis – a skillset that will prove invaluable in unearthing the most pertinent studies for your review. My forte includes constructing well-referenced and structured papers grounded in peer-reviewed literature and backed by sound research methodologies. What makes me an excellent fit for this project is my deep familiarity with the medical field as well as strict adherence to academic integrity standards. I have performed extensive literature reviews on diverse medical topics and have a strong understanding of relevant research databases that will enrich your review. Further, my 10+ years of experience allow me to navigate databases efficiently to yield up-to-date articles; a crucial requirement given that articles should be no older than 5 years in the proposed 23-25 page review.
$50 USD 3 päivässä
7,7
7,7

Systematic reviews on machine learning applications in clinical settings require precise synthesis of heterogeneous trial data while maintaining strict academic integrity standards. This project demands someone who understands both the methodological rigor of systematic review construction and the technical nuances of predictive analytics in perioperative contexts. The deliverable structure is clear: abstract, introduction with foundational literature, methods documentation for replicability, results synthesis across 13 clinical trials, discussion interpreting findings against the hypothesis, and a comprehensive evidence table. The constraint against AI-generated prose while leveraging AI as a research support tool is workable—analysis and synthesis remain human-driven while efficiency gains come from data organization. Based on the reference list provided, all sources fall within the 5-year window and focus on the Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) across surgical populations. The research question targets postoperative organ injury outcomes, which requires careful extraction and comparison of clinical trial endpoints. Construction of the evidence table will demand systematic categorization of study designs, populations, interventions, and measured outcomes. Ready to begin with database search documentation and initial literature mapping.
$30 USD 1 päivässä
7,4
7,4

Hello, I hope you’re doing well. I hold a masters degree in computer science (ML) from a renowned university. I am an experienced writer and I have access to IEEExplore. I can help you with writing systems review.
$1 000 USD 14 päivässä
7,3
7,3

Hi, I am a physician and medical writer with over five years of experience writing academic papers for various fields of medicine, nursing, clinical pharmaceuticals, psychology, and social science. I have a strong background in medical research and data analysis. I can write clear, concise, and well-structured theses and dissertations that meet the highest standards of quality and accuracy. I have published articles in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences. I can also conduct comprehensive literature reviews and synthesize information from various sources using online databases and tools. I am looking for a challenging and rewarding project as a medical writer where I can apply my skills and knowledge to create impactful and engaging content for diverse audiences. Please take a moment to review my portfolio, which includes examples of my writing skills, client feedback, and credentials.
$900 USD 7 päivässä
7,2
7,2

Hello dear, I am a professional ML expert and can do your task perfectly because I have done lots of similar tasks and also I am in top 1% here so just text me so I can help you out with your task Kind regards
$100 USD 1 päivässä
7,1
7,1

● I am an expert in writing detailed systematic review on "machine-learning early detection warning system for intraoperative hypotension." for around 25 pages. I Have done many SLR Papers exactly similar to your project. please feel free to connect in chat for discussion. Sure, I can handle your project on writing detailed systematic review on "machine-learning early detection warning system for intraoperative hypotension." I read your project description and I am sure that I can handle your project. I have done many literature review research papers, review articles, survey articles, and systematic review papers based on the client requirement. I will also provide table format comparison on the reference’s papers sued for the review articles based on the client requirement. ● Also, an expert in Research writing, research reports, essays and advance essays, dissertations. ● I will ensure that your project will be delivered on time with high standard. ● Expert in all referencing styles (APA/ Harvard / IEEE /MLA/etc.). ● 100 % Assurance on zero percent plagiarism. ● TURNITIN / COPYSCAPE p lagiarism report will be provided along with completed work ● Assistance will be provided with the number of clarifications until client satisfaction ● I will provide assistance even after the payment. And will maintain data (content) security.
$180 USD 3 päivässä
7,4
7,4

This requires true academic rigor and careful synthesis of recent trials. I’ve structured systematic reviews in clinical contexts, aligning with strict rubrics, clear methodology sections, and evidence tables that support defensible conclusions. I’ll build this fully from scratch using your references, ensuring proper flow across sections, clean data synthesis, and readiness for revision cycles. Do you have a preferred formatting style (APA/AMA/Vancouver)? Share any rubric nuances and deadline, and I’ll start outlining immediately.
$200 USD 5 päivässä
6,5
6,5

As a PhD researcher with a decade-long tenure in the field, I, Rahil, would be the ideal choice for undertaking this in-depth analysis of machine-learning early detection warning systems for intraoperative hypotension. My academic and professional experiences have imbued me with a deep understanding of AI systems and extensive experience in writing systematic reviews and research papers. Drawing on my expertise at Unilever Pakistan and State Bank of Pakistan, I’ve led the deployment of AI-powered solutions and developed voice recognition systems for sensitive state projects, which required meticulous documentation, adherence to stringent guidelines, as well as clear communication between complex concepts. These attributes align perfectly with your project's requirement for a well-referenced paper that educates readers. Not only do I possess sound knowledge about Clinical Trials, but my research-driven mindset also ensures that every piece of evidence included in the review is relevant, recent (as per your requirements), and significantly adds value to the study at hand. In addition to my technical expertise encompassing Python, R Programming and others, I am adept at Cloud Services and DevOps thus maintaining effective project management by leveraging tools like GitLab and Jira. Trust me with your project; you can expect meticulous workmanship with an unwavering commitment to delivering high-quality results on time.
$30 USD 5 päivässä
6,7
6,7

With 19+ years of experience in academic and medical research writing, I specialize in systematic reviews with rigorous methodology and clinical focus. I will develop a fully structured, original paper aligned with your guidelines—covering PRISMA-based methods, evidence synthesis, statistical interpretation, and clinical outcomes. I ensure precise use of recent trials, clear hypothesis testing, and Turnitin-safe writing. I’m also available for revisions based on your school’s feedback to ensure compliance and high academic standards.
$125 USD 2 päivässä
6,1
6,1

Hi, I can surely assist you in writing, drafting, and creating a detailed systematic review on machine-learning early detection systems for intraoperative hypotension. I have experience working with clinical research, organizing systematic reviews, and analyzing recent trials with a clear and structured approach. I will follow your exact academic requirements, keep the writing formal, well-referenced, and ensure all sections (abstract, methods, results, discussion, and evidence table) are properly developed. I will also focus strongly on clinical outcomes, prediction accuracy, and reduction in adverse events as required. I understand your need for revisions and will be available to make updates based on your school’s feedback. I have a few quick questions: Do you have a preferred citation style (APA, AMA, etc.)? Should I only use the provided references or also include a few more recent studies (within 5 years)? Thanks
$30 USD 1 päivässä
6,9
6,9

Hi, I specialize in conducting detailed systematic reviews, focusing on machine-learning early detection systems for intraoperative hypotension. With experience in academic writing and research assistance since 2016, I ensure a comprehensive analysis of clinical trials, meeting your academic submission requirements. In approaching this project, I plan to meticulously review relevant literature and analyze clinical outcomes with a specific focus on accuracy of predictions and reduction in adverse events. By adhering to your school's strict guidelines against AI-generated content, I will ensure a high-quality, manually crafted review tailored to your needs. Could you please provide clarity on the preferred citation style for referencing the articles in the review? This will help me align with your expectations seamlessly. Thank You
$40 USD 7 päivässä
5,9
5,9

As a machine learning engineer with a specialization in medical image analysis and deep learning, I bring unique and highly relevant skills to your systematic review project. My career has centered around turning complex medical data, such as images and time series signals, into robust machine learning solutions that deliver actionable insights. This aligns perfectly with your academic needs for a comprehensive analysis of clinical trials utilizing AI to address the utility of ML-based early detection warning systems for intraoperative hypotension. Let's team up to leave no stone unturned in exploring whether ML early detection systems can minimize postoperative organ injury stemming from Intraoperative hypotension! Message me so we can discuss how we'll achieve this together efficiently and accurately, well within your timeframe.
$140 USD 7 päivässä
6,1
6,1

As someone with over a decade of experience in academic research and writing, I am well-versed in crafting systematic reviews that pull from existing clinical trials. I have an innate understanding of selecting the most relevant studies to support arguments and answering specific research questions. In addition, my expertise in medical writing will ensure that I can navigate the complex subject matter required for your systematic review on machine-learning early detection warning systems for hypotension. Rest assured, I embrace stringent requirements and meticulous attention to detail — key values in academic work. I'm well-prepared to incorporate revisions as per your school's suggestion, maintaining a 100% human-written content while using AI solely for assistance purposes. Since I am proficient in various statistical methods, my approach would involve meticulous data analysis that would be essential for discussing clinical outcomes accurately and evaluating the efficacy of machine learning warning systems compared to standard care monitoring.
$100 USD 1 päivässä
6,2
6,2

With both medical expertise and writing proficiency, I'm well-suited to handle this important project for you. Having conducted several systematic reviews, including academic dissertations similar to yours, I possess a deep understanding of the medical field and am well-versed with the databases needed to obtain relevant sources. Furthermore, my familiarity with PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus ensures that I can deliver up-to-date studies within the specified 5-year timeline. Drawing from my previous experience as a physician and my current role as a medical writer, I am skilled in constructing well-referenced articles that adhere to strict academic standards; an essential requirement for your review. As you want revisions periodically done in line with your school's demands, my flexibility and timeliness will be highly valuable assets in our collaboration. Working together we will meticulously analyze the literature, ensuring accurate reporting of clinical trials and providing you with an error-free, comprehensive review.
$250 USD 5 päivässä
6,6
6,6

Brooklyn, United States
Maksutapa vahvistettu
Liittynyt huhtik. 8, 2026
₹600-1500 INR
$250-750 USD
$250-750 USD
₹600-601 INR
$30-250 USD
₹600-1500 INR
₹400-750 INR/ tunnissa
$30-250 CAD
₹1500-12500 INR
₹100-400 INR/ tunnissa
£20-250 GBP
$30-250 USD
₹1500-12500 INR
₹12500-37500 INR
£35-45 GBP/ tunnissa
₹100-400 INR/ tunnissa
$30-250 USD
₹600-1500 INR
$15-25 USD/ tunnissa
$30-250 USD